main menu | youngsters categories | authors | new stories | search | links | settings | author tools |
Comments on ‘Operation Challenge’ at Kangaroo Valley (standard:non fiction, 526 words) | |||
Author: PeterFromOZ | Added: Apr 02 2011 | Views/Reads: 3374/0 | Story vote: 0.00 (0 votes) |
Comments on ‘Operation Challenge’ at Kangaroo Valley - is comments about a physical and team-work building exercise in Australia | |||
Comments on ‘Operation Challenge' at Kangaroo Valley ‘Operation Challenge' strikes me as being about making the participants feel good about being team players. I have nothing against this. But what also strikes me about it is that when I reflect on its activities, I have learnt lessons which were unintended. The lessons I learnt from OC, on reflection, are: 1. Question Authority 2. When inadequate resources are provided, more personnel are needed. The Red Machine The red machine is a ‘problem' where a small team is given the job of disassembling a widget – into the smallest possible parts, passing each piece through the smallest hole of a screen, each team member going through the screen, and reassembling the widget. This must be done in the fastest possible time. The lesson that I learnt from this is: Question Authority Q) Why disassemble the widget (at all)? Q) Why disassemble it into the smallest possible components? – Why not simply disassemble it into a few large pieces and then pass them through the largest hole? Q) Why is necessary to pass the pieces through the smallest holes? This is not for quality control reasons, as there is no time taken to inspect the pieces of the widget once it has been disassembled. Indeed consider the case of if the widget were comprised of 1000 pieces, surely you would agree that the same procedure would be foolhardy, and that the faster you did it the greater the chances of incorrectly reassembling it. The lesson learned then is: disassemble it into the fewest number of pieces. If the team were to simply disassemble the widget into a few components, then the design of the screen could be simplified to just one large hole – which need not be any bigger than the biggest existing hole in the current screen. Q) Why is speed a factor? Surely safety has not been considered. I am surprised that someone has not yet had an eye poked out. Are the pieces consider to be unbreakable? If yes, then they could well injure someone, particularly if they are rushed around. If not, then the pieces could be broken easily. Indeed one tip we were given was to loosen the strap then hit it hard to make it fall apart (then continue disassembly). Not a good idea if it is fragile! The Bottom-Less Pit This is an exercise where the team has to cross a bottom-less pit using limited resources. There are 2 long planks supplied – but neither of these will reach across (and some other equipment). This exercise is meant to emphasis the importance of teamwork – yes it can be done, however, this seems to illustrate lesson #2: When inadequate resources are provided, more personnel are needed. If a long-enough plank were supplied then only one person would be needed. The extra people are required because the resources supplied are inadequate for one person to get across to the other side. There were other activities which were quite enjoyable. I'm sorry that these comments are quite negative but I feel that they needed to be said, and while others may have thought them, no-one was saying them. Tweet
Authors appreciate feedback! Please write to the authors to tell them what you liked or didn't like about the story! |
PeterFromOZ has 30 active stories on this site. Profile for PeterFromOZ, incl. all stories Email: pew@pcug.org.au |