main menu | standard categories | authors | new stories | search | links | settings | author tools |
Why I Hate Shakespeare (standard:Editorials, 1222 words) | |||
Author: DAVID TUMUSIIME | Added: May 27 2003 | Views/Reads: 7248/2963 | Story vote: 0.00 (0 votes) |
I know there are going to be some furious fans but this message has to get out. The title says it all. | |||
Click here to read the first 75 lines of the story down for his plays these fresh springs of genius the Mermaid beer was unloosing. Good old no nonsense dictionary writing Samuel Jonson tried to correct all the silly babbling about the upstart's plays by showing how it should be truly done by rewriting some of them. Doctor or not, try as he might, no resuscitation could bring his own dead plays to life. He did the cause bad, good old gouty Sam John. A whole lexicologist could not do it? Given a doctorate and all? Henceforth the cause was more or less lost among the writers. Uninterrupted since has flowed in disgusting detailing why he is supposed to be great. It is not in contention, as far as many of these sell outs are concerned, whether he actually deserves all the soaps and pubs and roads and many little kids named after him. The competition is who can be the flowerily adjectival in sucking up to him. John Milton, author of Paradise Lost, groveling about how Shakespeare had built himself a living monument. But this was Milton, he probably was more thinking of himself. Built them he did all right, very dead and antique ones for himself. Only his titles survive. And those only harassed poor students remember and as soon as they can forget them with relief. John Dryden came along, wooden and crafty trying to hang his star there. Check Samuel Taylor Coleridge, the Romantic poet. Coleridge supposed to be a rebel and revolutionary. Listen to him trip over himself. Always the Ancient Mariner, he borrowed from his little masterpiece to crown Shakespeare with an “oceanic mind.” In his own opium frenzies seeing double where there was one, he decided Shakespeare must be too “thousand souled.” Well all that over advertising finally got him, at last. There is now your two minutes quotable Shakespeare for everyone. Yeah, now everyone can ask when faced with a tough choice, “The question is to be or not to be.” Newspaper columnists and hacks strapped for a beginning can always meanderingly start, “A rose by any other name...” But there are still the resistors. The proud and valiant pockets of resistance who are not taken in by the masquerade that struts before us like a semi nude model in fishnets. These hold out and cry “down with the tyrannical evil Shakespearean regime!” Bloody hell, can't you tell by now? Even if I live 20 times over to toothless bone shaking ninety, I never will be even a quart of how fabulous this damned fellow is. The truest spoken words on him were by a fellow straggler who had to keep his name a secret. You know assaulting this crook is regarded as a terrorist act. Bombs away if you are known. I'm not even allowed to mention word for word. But it was divine anyway. The gist is that of all the people in the world dead, Shakespeare is the one person I would like to dig up and throw stones at. Tweet
Authors appreciate feedback! Please write to the authors to tell them what you liked or didn't like about the story! |
DAVID TUMUSIIME has 18 active stories on this site. Profile for DAVID TUMUSIIME, incl. all stories Email: braveworldus@yahoo.com |